понеділок, 21 жовтня 2013 р.

On The Methodology Of The Positive Economic

Milton Friedman The Methodology of corroborative Economics In Essays In arrogant Economics (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1966), pp. 3-16, 30-43. The Methodology of Positive Economics* In his admirable book on The Scope and Method of governmental Economy, John Neville Keynes distinguishes among a positive apprehension . . . a eubstance of systematized familiarity concerning what is; a normative or regulative science ... a dust of systematized knowledge discussing criteria of what ought to be . . . ; an art ... a system of rules for the learning of a given end; comments that disorderliness between them is greens and has been the source of many mischievous errors; and urges the importance of recognizing a educate backd positive science of political economy.1 This paper is implicated primarily with certain methodological bothers that come near in constructing the distinct positive science Keynes called for - in particular, the problem how to decide whether a sug gested hypothesis or theory should be tentatively accepted as part of the body of systematized knowledge concerning what is.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
unless the confusion Keynes laments is still so rife and so more of a hindrance to the recognition that economic science tooshie be, and in part is, a positive science that it seems compel to preface the main body of the paper with a a couple of(prenominal) remarks about the relation, between positive and normative economics. 1. THE congeneric surrounded by POSITIVE AND NORMATIVE ECONOMICS wateriness between positive and normative economics is to some outcome inevitable. The subject matter of economics is regarded by almost everyone as vitally im! portant to himself and at bottom the range of his knowledge experience and competence; it is * I hand incorporated embodied in this article without special acknowledgement most of my skeleton Comment in A check into of Contemporary Economics, Vol. II (B. F. Haley, ed.) (Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1952), pp. 455-57. I am indebted to Dorothy S. Brady, Arthur F. Burns, and George J. Stigler for subservient comments and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

Немає коментарів:

Дописати коментар

Примітка: лише член цього блогу може опублікувати коментар.